The Arts Commission took a close look at significant changes proposed for the city’s grant programs for artists and creative organizations on Monday, raising questions about how new eligibility rules, scoring criteria and funding structures would affect the city’s diverse cultural ecosystem.
Commissioners and staff from the newly formed Department of Arts, Culture, Music and Entertainment (ACME) discussed the pending changes for roughly two hours marked by respectful but pointed exchanges. Commissioners broadly welcomed the city’s effort to simplify and modernize its
grant programs
but pressed staff on how the proposed structure would address longstanding concerns around equity, access and trust.
At the core of the discussion was a
draft plan
to consolidate the city’s three primary cultural funding programs under a single set of guidelines, with aligned eligibility rules, simplified applications and clearer scoring rubrics.
The Thrive, Elevate and Nexus programs each target a different segment of Austin’s creative community: Thrive is designed for larger nonprofit arts organizations with a track record and dedicated space; Elevate supports mid-sized nonprofits and arts groups; and Nexus provides smaller, one-time grants to individual artists and collectives.
Some of the more substantial changes proposed included:
Unified Guidelines:
Thrive
,
Elevate
and
Nexus
programs would operate under a single set of guidelines to streamline applications, scoring, and administrative processes.
Tiered Eligibility and Awards:
Applicants would be grouped by type (e.g., nonprofit with space, nonprofit without space, individual artist), with different funding caps ranging from $2,500 to $250,000 based on size and experience.
New Scoring Criteria:
All applications would be evaluated using point-based systems covering creative work, organizational capacity, public engagement and resiliency. Bonus points could be available for applicants who haven’t received recent city or federal funding.
Standardized Appeals:
A new universal appeals process applied across all programs to address scoring disputes or eligibility concerns.
Early Eligibility Screening:
Applicants would undergo an eligibility review before the full application opens, to reduce confusion and wasted effort.
Safeguards Against “Double Dipping”:
New policies could prevent organizations or individuals from receiving overlapping grants or disproportionately large shares of public funds across programs.
Commissioners expressed concern that tiered awards, while well-intentioned, might unintentionally reinforce barriers for smaller or emerging artists, particularly those who don’t have access to institutional infrastructure or professional grant-writing resources. Several members cited recent examples of promising artists who struggled to meet prior grant program requirements, leading to frustration, burnout or disengagement.
“I feel like we’re centering administrative capabilities, which is a really old school way of grant making that really does alienate folks that are doing great work.” Commissioner Faiza Kracheni said. “Maybe they’re trying to build their board, and maybe they’re trying to build their budget, and that’s why they’re applying for grant funding.”
Others raised questions about how the restructured programs would affect longstanding nonprofits that have historically received city funding but may now be subject to new performance expectations or evaluation frameworks. Some commissioners cautioned that changes intended to improve transparency or impact measurement might inadvertently penalize groups that are deeply embedded in their communities but less adept at navigating administrative systems.
Staff from ACME said the proposed framework was developed in direct response to community feedback gathered during a public engagement process known as the “creative reset” That process included surveys, citywide sessions, focus groups and one-on-one interviews. Key takeaways included the need for simplified applications, a universal appeals process and stronger protections against perceived conflicts of interest.
Several commissioners asked how the city would ensure that artistic merit and cultural value remain central to grantmaking, rather than shifting too far toward quantifiable metrics such as audience size or marketing reach. Others asked whether the proposed guidelines adequately distinguish between arts organizations with mission-driven goals and for-profit entities focused more on entertainment.
ACME staff emphasized the universal system would balance creativity, organizational capacity, public engagement and resiliency using narrative material and quantifiable data.
Commissioners voiced concern about how to reconcile the city’s goals for professionalization, economic development and tourism with the needs of independent artists and grassroots groups that may be less visible (but no less vital) to Austin’s cultural identity.
Chair Gina Houston said the city’s goal of getting more grant money dispersed through the end of this year and in early 2026 will require the commission to accept some changes to processes that have been in place since the recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic.
“I understand that it’s shocking for changes to be happening so quickly. Unfortunately, we are in a tight timeframe and we have to get something out, get the feedback, make changes sensitive to the feedback, and get a final project,” she said.
“We’re never gonna satisfy everyone. It’s just not gonna be possible to satisfy everyone, but we have to at some point get to a final project… we just do.”
Commissioners said they would continue reviewing the materials and expected to revisit the item in a future meeting.
Photo made available through
a Creative Commons license.
The
Austin Monitor
’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available
here
, and our code of ethics is explained
here
.
You’re a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?
