According to a consultant report released last month, the city might look into naming rights, increased partnerships, additional user fees, and possibly the establishment of a regional park authority as part of a larger effort to overcome a widening revenue deficit in the parks system. The research, which was commissioned by the Parks and Recreation Department, provides both immediate and long-term solutions to the department’s budgetary difficulties.
The parks department lacks the revenue diversification observed in peer systems and depends more on general fund assistance than many similar cities, according to consultants PFM Group Consulting and the Trust for Public Land. The agency earned $15.9 million from internal sources in 2024 and got roughly $100.5 million from the city’s general fund, leaving an anticipated $84.6 million in funding gaps annually.
Rising operating and maintenance expenditures are expected to cause that deficit to widen to $168.7 million by 2030 if no new funding sources are found.
A variety of short- and long-term funding options are presented in the report, such as adding a $1 monthly park maintenance fee to utility bills, extending the use of drainage utility funds to account for parks’ ecological value, updating cost recovery policies for programs and rentals, and formally granting the city the authority to accept corporate sponsorships and naming rights.
Longer-term suggestions include looking into the establishment of a local government corporation to manage park operations, pursuing future bond funding, or pursuing state legislation that would permit the establishment of a regional park district that would include Travis County and other jurisdictions.
As PARD continues its work in response to an order from the City Council to develop sustainable funding options for the city’s park system, those findings are included in a recent city document. The consultant study was summed up in the document, which also mentioned that additional analysis will be provided to Council by February 2026.
The memo also emphasizes the intricacy of Austin’s park portfolio, which consists of ecological preserves, historical assets, cultural institutions, and recreation centers. As federal programs encounter new limitations and local resources continue to be scarce, each of these elements may need a different approach to finance.
To disseminate project updates and background information, the department has developed a website that is accessible to the general public. According to a survey conducted this spring for community participation, 91 percent of participants favored more financing for parks, swimming pools, and other amenities.
The present status of creating a regional park system was the main topic of discussion at the Climate, Water, Environment, and Parks Committee meeting of the City Council on Wednesday. PARD staff stated that it would probably take many state legislative sessions to modify the necessary laws.
According to Council Member Ryan Alter, he would investigate whether the city can include additional park-specific fees on passes for the Austin City Limits Festival, the biggest event that utilize city parks’ amenities and held at Zilker Metropolitan Park.
Council Member Paige Ellis stated that in order to earn $5.4 million a year for park use, the city would have to make a compelling argument to the public for the necessity of a $1 monthly service fee. Regarding the issue of additional fees for using the facilities, she stated that the city must ensure that the modifications do not impose obstacles on residents with lower incomes.
“I don’t want this to become a situation where our city park spaces are only accessible to those who have more money,” she remarked. Although I would want to see the parks department receive a larger portion of the general fund, we are in a difficult situation since public safety now receives two-thirds of it, and we are still debating the need to boost spending for public safety. Additionally, we must ensure that the property we control is being properly maintained and that all visitors to our parks have access to clean and accessible areas.
Members of the Austin Parks and Recreation Board expressed concerns during Monday’s meeting on the long-term prospects for outside funding that sustains the city’s park system.
Parks board members pointed out that typical grant programs are becoming more unpredictable and recommended bringing together advocacy organizations and nonprofits for a more comprehensive discussion about funding concerns and possible coordination.
“From reductions and clawbacks of funding through the Land and Water Conservation Fund to diminishment of community grants through the National Park Service, the (parks) industry itself is in a state of, let’s say, concern, perhaps chaos,” boardmember Ted Eubanks said.
Perhaps it’s time to get all of these groups together in one room at a time for a meeting to talk about where we are at with this, what we can expect, what won’t be there, what will be there, and what other options are there?
PARD director Jess Aguirre supported the idea of working with other parks-related organizations to plan for handling outside financial hits that haven’t yet appeared locally in his remarks to the board.
We’ve been lucky enough so far that those things haven’t been reclaimed, but I definitely welcome the chance to participate in those conversations and share where we are, he added. For instance, we were concerned that a federal fund that would support some of our senior transportation initiatives might not materialize, but it did. We recently learned about this.
Community donations enable the work of the Austin Monitors. Even though we occasionally publish on funders, we take pains to ensure transparency by keeping editorial and business activities apart. Our code of ethics is described here, and a full list of donors may be seen here.
You’re a community leader
And we are thrilled that you trust us with important, in-depth news. You are aware that local and committed watchdog reporting is essential to a healthy community. We will always be here to support you. Will you now support our nonprofit news organization and take the bold next step?
